which one is better or none?
그 문장들엔 점이 끝에다가 붙어 있을 줄은 알았는데
그 문장들엔 점이 끝에다가 붙여 있을 줄은 알았는데
(the difference is in 붙어 \ 붙여)

See a translation

Show answer from the AI monga

In Korean, both "그 문장들엔 점이 끝에다가 붙어 있을 줄은 알았는데" and "그 문장들엔 점이 끝에다가 붙여 있을 줄은 알았는데" are grammatically correct sentences. The difference lies in the verb form used after the word "끝에다가" (at the end).

The first sentence, "그 문장들엔 점이 끝에다가 붙어 있을 줄은 알았는데," uses the verb form "붙어 있을" which is the continuous form of the verb "붙다" (to stick). This form indicates that the dots are already attached/stuck at the end of the sentences.

Example:
- 그 문장들엔 점이 끝에다가 붙어 있을 줄은 알았는데, 왜 지워졌어요? (I knew that there were dots attached at the end of those sentences, why were they erased?)

On the other hand, the second sentence, "그 문장들엔 점이 끝에다가 붙여 있을 줄은 알았는데," uses the verb form "붙여 있을" which is the future form of the verb "붙이다" (to attach/stick). This form indicates that the dots will be attached/stuck at the end of the sentences.

Example:
- 그 문장들엔 점이 끝에다가 붙여 있을 줄은 알았는데, 언제 붙일 건가요? (I knew that there will be dots attached at the end of those sentences, when will you attach them?)

So, to summarize, the difference between "붙어 있을" and "붙여 있을" is that the former indicates the dots are already attached, while the latter indicates that the dots will be attached in the future. The choice between the two depends on the context and the intended meaning.